In the quote above, Faber describes books and their content to Montag, who as started to rebel against society through books. Faber was a very special and memorable person Montag met in a park a few years back. They had a conversation in which Faber recited some poems to him and because of that, Montag knew he was a rebel; a reader. He was the only person Montag could think of that would help him in his situation. Faber is the one that uttered this quote and is, by far, my favorite character in the book. The way he describes books is so unique. He uses many figures of speech to explain books and even society. Because of this, what he says usually has indirect meanings. Take this quote for example. This quote contains metaphors and personifications that describe Montagâ€™s society and why books are burned. â€œPores in the face of lifeâ€ is a personification that represents the â€œproblems in life.â€ Pores on our faces are unwanted, ugly, problematic. Same with the issues in our lives. It makes people unhappy, and brings torture in their lives. People are afraid of this; therefore, they are removed, avoided. Books reveal these â€œpores in the face of life,â€ so they are removed as well. Thatâ€™s how Montagâ€™s government controls Montagâ€™s society. Through fake, hollow happiness. The government digs a hole and buries the locked treasure box filled with everyoneâ€™s emotions (excluding happiness) and issues deep inside the hole. Heck, they even teach society to do that themselves! For the next sentence, â€œflowersâ€ is a metaphor for ideas. â€œGood rainâ€ and â€œblack loamâ€ represents creativity and imagination. â€œFlowersâ€ need Good rainâ€ and â€œblack loamâ€ to blossom into something grand, special, unique. But, because the â€œflowersâ€ are growing on other â€œflowers,â€ they become identical to it. Each and every â€œflowerâ€ grows on each other until the world is covered in identical flowers. A few are different, yes, but they slowly dwindle through the influence of the identical â€œflowersâ€ and the disturbance of nature those â€œflowersâ€ created. Those â€œspecial flowersâ€ may transform into an â€œidentical flower,â€ or, they die. Journal #4 May 5, 2013 â€œâ€¦They were gone. The Hound was gone. Now there was only the river and Montag floating in a sudden peacefulness, away from the city and the lights and the chase, away from everything.â€ (Pg. 140, Fahrenheit 451) This quote occurs after Montag kills Beatty and two other firemen, as well as burn the Salamander, after his house was burnt by them. Because of that, he is now being chased by firemen in helicopters and Salamanders, and a more efficient and high tech Mechanical Hound. Montag visits Faber one last time, receiving money, new clothes, and directions from him, and then runs into the river, which carries him away to safety. The Hound and firemen then loses track of him. This quote is where, in my opinion, the climax ends and the resolution starts. Itâ€™s when Montag completes his transition from â€œmindless followerâ€ to â€œindependent thinker.â€ All with natureâ€™s aid. Nature, at this moment, is shown as something that overrules technology. Even when itâ€™s faced with the highest, most efficient technology that the humans can create, nature wins. Nature was able to bring Montag to safety from the Hound and the clutches of society and technology, to help him escape from everything that was holding him back. The peace and relaxation nature provides help Montag complete his thinking process, which was incomplete because he couldnâ€™t really think when he was surrounded by the fast-moving, overly colorful things, people that didnâ€™t give a damn about anything except for themselves and their happiness, and a government thatâ€™s watching your every move. Not until he was completely separated from all that was he able to accept his new self and to move on; to make peace with his inner conflicts. Even he wasnâ€™t able to accept and make peace when he was with Faber, someone he trusted and cared for. He was wounded by technology and healed by nature.
Is Clausewitz's unfinished work On War still worth reading and studying in the 21st century - Essay Example
Military generals and war diplomats of modern period continue to depend on Clausewitz for better war strategies. This paper takes a brief look at his famous book, On War, translated by J.J.Graham.
Clausewitz, could not complete his book during his lifetime. Whatever is left behind by him in the form of On War has been sufficient for the future war scholars and military officers to understand war as a subject of study. The fact that the book was written before the modern war- weapons were invented, and that the book is interesting even in this nuclear age itself speak volumes about the greatness of the work. The book is not altogether without criticism or negative qualities, but its acceptance as a source for the war specialists is stronger than its negative aspects. It is being taught in the military schools and many debates and critical analyses based on the book have continued to take place.
On War is divided into eight sections, with each section having several chapters. A wide ranging topics related to war are defined and discussed by the writer with apt examples from history. It is very difficult to give here the exact content of the book in the condensed form due to the enormity of the various aspects of war dealt by Clausewitz. At the same time, any discussion of a topic like war demands that all its aspects are taken into consideration. Hence, the attempt here is to embrace as many facts given by the author as possible.
Book I, chapter 1, gives clear a definition of war. According to Clausewitz, â€œ war is nothing but a duel on an extensive scaleâ€(Clausewitz, 1873). He says that it is an act of violence. This is a clear confession. He stresses that in war there is no sprit of benevolence or any kind of moderation . After rejecting such absurd views, he goes on to highlight that, even in a civilized society, passionate hatred of each other is the basic instinct for waging war. It is not an
12/4/2019 0 Comments
Multiple Intelligences - Research Paper Example
Evidence from Neo-Piagetian theorists are presented who argue Gardner ignores general processing efficiency, an aspect of mental functioning that directly supports notions of a general intelligence. Other criticism from cognitive theorists is presented that argues the theory of multiple intelligences misunderstands maturity in that it considers intelligence as an end-point and not a dynamic process. Criticisms of multiple intelligence theory are also considered in terms of the means that the theory has been implemented. One such criticism argues that its implementation in education has neglected the necessary development of comprehensive mental functioning for focus on single area skills. Furthermore, objections are levied by cognitive-neuroscientists. These individuals have conducted parts of the brain and argue that the research attests to a shared set of genes associated with subjects Gardner attributes to multiple mental functioning, including mathematics and reading. Support of multiple intelligence theory is then considered. Gardnerâ€™s own contention that his theory properly considers the nature of previously labeled abilities as intelligence is noted. Theorists who argue that those who believe Gardnerâ€™s theories of multiple intelligence are merely abilities, use tautologies rather than empirical support establish support for Gardnerâ€™s perspective on this distinction. The research then works towards establishing more empirical methods of support for Gardnerâ€™s theory. In these regards, action research and scales that implement Gardnerâ€™s theory of multiple intelligences successful are considered as they attest to the potential existence of an underlining neurophysiology along the lines that Gardner has argued. Finally, the research concludes arguing that while there is strong indirect evidence supporting Gardner his theory may ultimately not have enough empirical support.
One of the major theories that have had an impact on educational approaches
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.